QUOTE(aussiemcgr @ Dec 22 2008, 04:30 AM)

Honestly though, when the hell was the UN accomplished anything? Think all the way back to the League of Nations.
As far as mischief and wasting incredible amounts of money are concerned, the UN has accomplished plenty.
As far as performing a useful service to the cause of humanity and world peace is concerned, it has accomplished nothing (other than to set these causes back 100 years or so). The UN gave the world some serious clues as to its nature in the 1960's when it brutally slapped down an attempt by Katanga Province to secede from the oppressive communist government of the Congo. The 46 civilian doctors of Elizabethville published a book filled with photos and eyewitness accounts of the massacre, by UN troops, of men, women, and children, bombing of Red Cross hospitals, etc. Most of the world ignored their warning.
The premise for its existence is basically that if you can get the good guys and the bad guys to unite in a common cause, there will be world peace. In real life, things don't work that way and never will.
The real reason it came to be is to become a world government that will permit all political power in the world to be concentrated in the hands of a tiny clique of men who will not be answerable to anyone. What sort of men do you think will gravitate to such positions? Nice, benevolent ones with the Good of the People in mind? Not on this planet.
There are worse things than the threat of war among nations. One of them is having to live on a planetary prison where there is no chance of the tyrannical world government being overthrown because they own all the weapons.
There have been more wars since the founding of the UN in 1945, than there have ever been in any other comparable period of human history.
The best thing to do about the UN would be to abolish it.