This reply to the topic I have pondered for quite sometime, since my joining, and I hope everybody, somebody, anybody takes no offense as to the nature of its contents, I'm going to sincerely attempt to keep it PG-13 rated (but I'm not in that business of censoring the natural law(s))
A poem I perchance stumbled upon (I believe I got it right), Author: Unknown
There was a most important job that needed to be done,
And no reason not to do it, there was absolutely none.
But in vital matters such as this the thing you have to ask,
is who exactly will it be who’ll carry out this task.
Anybody could have told you that Everybody knew,
that this was something Somebody would surely have to do.
Nobody was unwilling, Anybody had the ability,
but Nobody thought he was supposed to be the one.
It seemed to be a job that Anybody could have done,
If Anybody thought he was supposed to be the one.
But since Everybody recognized that Anybody could,
Everybody took for granted that Somebody would.
But Nobody told Anybody that we are aware of,
That he would be in charge of seeing it was taken care of.
And Nobody took it on himself to follow through and do,
What Everybody thought that Somebody would do.
When what Everybody needs so to do did not get done at all,
Everybody was complaining that Somebody dropped the ball.
Anybody then could see it was an awful crying shame,
And Everybody looked around for Somebody to blame.
Somebody should have done the job and Everybody would have,
But in the end Nobody did what Anybody could have.
It is my opinion: (
generally and quickly noting)
The
legally status'd adult (aged) that could, would, and, should participate
fully in the governing affairs of their private existences are to be lifelong responsible to their endeavor(s) of
any creation(s) (living and non-living) in all matters that one chooses to participate in/by the one's free will.
There is an obligation of everyone, someone, and anyone to speak up and correct a perceived
wrong so that the perceived wrong may become a perceived right through effective communication to maintain the current established societal norm.
The
legally status'd children (under aged) of the aged need nurturing guidance from
both of their parents to developmentally evolve to partake in a
legal society, this nurturing is additionally re-enforced in support by the/a community-at-large in which the under aged is environed. When such aged guidance begins to fail (or is perceived leading to failure) the aged are obliged (you want the best for the child, don't you?) to enlighten the under aged of the full ramifications and subsequent consequences,
good or bad, of the under aged's persistent action(s). Should enlightenment not take an aged desired effect, a parentally administrated instruction necessary in and of responsible encouragement from the under aged parents must occur to maintain the current perceived
legal societal normality.
(We, as we are, in the mind do not perceive thoughts in words but rather in pictures that we then attempt to either communicate or effectively communicate. This choice of non-effective or effective communication is up to the individual, once again in/by free will) As the under aged are,
as a general rule, not held accountable for their action(s) and the responsibility for mis-deeded action(s) fall back upon the parents - this is not to be confused with good-deeded action(s) in which we (all noticing) applaud and credit the under aged in/for their advanced achievements (advancement in/by the achieved) and on occasion graciously notice the parents.
The
legally status'd child (under aged) has the necessary obligation of heeding the voice of experience (the aged) to keep from perceived dangerous or ill-fated destination(s), or
on the other hand, to keep in perceived enjoyable or well-fated destination(s) in/of the life ahead of them. The under aged
has an inherited unalienable (if not inalienable) right to free will agency- but as an under aged that right of and in agency is to be held checked by the parents (it is this "checked" agency that sometimes leads to rebellious behavior(s) against the norms of society by the under aged).
In an Industrial (non-Aquarian) -
here: I'll call it legal - society there is no real need for children (save the aspect of replenishment of suppliers and consumers in/of/for Gross National Product, GNP).
In an Aquarian (non-Industrial) -
here: I'll call it lawful - society there is need for children (to assist in chores about the land to provide ease for sustenance).
To touch upon of a Godly (non-Industrial and non-Aquarian) society: Go out and be fruitful and multiply.
As the world generally is an Industrial society: Boys; keep your pants on and zipped/buttoned up, Girls; keep your knickers on and up never allow your skirt to be lifted up until such time as the two of you become of legal age and support yourselves first and then provide for what you can afford secondly (It is not my responsibility to financially pay for your mistakes that your parents allowed to occur through their own negligence and/or laziness). If you do not there are legal consequences that will run your life (may be even possibly ruin an otherwise bright future) and lead to further discontent of your already restless and hollow self-serving personality.
As, if the world,
generally, were an Aquarian society:
generally as a rule: The Amish (and like in temperament) don't have computers so this reply will not tolerate the topical discussion.
As,
generally, if the Earth remained as it was in the beginning this topic would not even be in discussion anywhere for any reason, everyone would already know and adhere to the instruction of God. (It is with respect that the term "God" used here is not dis-respective or respective of any particular faith or religious practice(s) of any - but rather to give eloquence to Divinity worshiped).
I'm not a psychologist, nor a teacher . . . I'm just nobody.