Please review my store and let me know if you find it web 2.0.
Templates are uploaded weekly, so please be patient if you find some categories empty.
Thank you
http://www.onlinetemplates.org
Full Version: New Web 2.0 Templates Store
I think it's neat but I wouldn't pay for a template that I couldn't see at least a FULL picture preview of, if not a demo.
But it looks nice
But it looks nice
cool looks good. and at least they are cheaper. some sites charge a thousand dollars for a template that you could easily make. good work 
Yes, It's nice site but I agree with Creactive on this one. I'd prefer to see a Live Demo of the templates before I'd even consider buying them.
QUOTE(Valency @ Apr 7 2008, 02:10 PM) 
Yes, It's nice site but I agree with Creactive on this one. I'd prefer to see a Live Demo of the templates before I'd even consider buying them.
I cannot make live links for some templates because they can be stolen from the server...Some of them have like the Oscommerce templates
Did you make any of theses templates etc...?
QUOTE(Crown @ Apr 16 2008, 09:48 AM)
Did you make any of theses templates etc...?
Not any. All of them
1. I'm going to be honest, the design looks a bit plain. In the banner all you have is a monitor that only displays an image. So what?! What's so special about that monitor. Normally in a design you need to have a purpose for putting a certain item in there. I think that the banner area next to the monitor needs some work to be done. (Sorry for being a bit harsh, this is the website review which does incorporate layout 
)
2. Also on the navigation hover, I still see that 1px white block to the left and to the right. Try using transparent gif or png files. It will look much better.
3. If I am a customer, I would want to see the categories before some ad of the templates available. I really don't like that rotating marquee displaying the latest items. You can do that on the index page.
4. The use of font. Not sure why you have all bolds on that site. Generally designers use bold to make something unique from the rest of the content on the page. Making everything bold will regularly confuse users. It also looks better not to have it in bold.
I would suggest you review the ideas that templateworld.com. I used to own my own design site for a while including holding a graphicz.com in our hands. I have had much experience. Please do not think I am being unfair or harsh, I'm just trying to give you some feedback.
)2. Also on the navigation hover, I still see that 1px white block to the left and to the right. Try using transparent gif or png files. It will look much better.
3. If I am a customer, I would want to see the categories before some ad of the templates available. I really don't like that rotating marquee displaying the latest items. You can do that on the index page.
4. The use of font. Not sure why you have all bolds on that site. Generally designers use bold to make something unique from the rest of the content on the page. Making everything bold will regularly confuse users. It also looks better not to have it in bold.
I would suggest you review the ideas that templateworld.com. I used to own my own design site for a while including holding a graphicz.com in our hands. I have had much experience. Please do not think I am being unfair or harsh, I'm just trying to give you some feedback.
I have to agree with IamShipon on this one. The layout is plain. But my main problem with is...
THERE'S NO SUCH FUCKING THING AS WEB 2.0. God dammit, Web 2.0 DOES NOT exist. It's just a fancy catch phrase for "newer" and templates that are more fancy that people like. So what? People could've made "Web 2.0" templates before "Web 2.0" even existed. It's a catch phrase that means nothing. Never has, never will.
I'm sick and tired of people trying to convey their websites as 2 point friggin 0 when it's NOT.
THERE'S NO SUCH FUCKING THING AS WEB 2.0. God dammit, Web 2.0 DOES NOT exist. It's just a fancy catch phrase for "newer" and templates that are more fancy that people like. So what? People could've made "Web 2.0" templates before "Web 2.0" even existed. It's a catch phrase that means nothing. Never has, never will.
I'm sick and tired of people trying to convey their websites as 2 point friggin 0 when it's NOT.
QUOTE(IamShipon1988 @ Apr 17 2008, 04:24 AM)
1. I'm going to be honest, the design looks a bit plain. In the banner all you have is a monitor that only displays an image. So what?! What's so special about that monitor. Normally in a design you need to have a purpose for putting a certain item in there. I think that the banner area next to the monitor needs some work to be done. (Sorry for being a bit harsh, this is the website review which does incorporate layout )
2. Also on the navigation hover, I still see that 1px white block to the left and to the right. Try using transparent gif or png files. It will look much better.
3. If I am a customer, I would want to see the categories before some ad of the templates available. I really don't like that rotating marquee displaying the latest items. You can do that on the index page.
4. The use of font. Not sure why you have all bolds on that site. Generally designers use bold to make something unique from the rest of the content on the page. Making everything bold will regularly confuse users. It also looks better not to have it in bold.
I would suggest you review the ideas that templateworld.com. I used to own my own design site for a while including holding a graphicz.com in our hands. I have had much experience. Please do not think I am being unfair or harsh, I'm just trying to give you some feedback.
)2. Also on the navigation hover, I still see that 1px white block to the left and to the right. Try using transparent gif or png files. It will look much better.
3. If I am a customer, I would want to see the categories before some ad of the templates available. I really don't like that rotating marquee displaying the latest items. You can do that on the index page.
4. The use of font. Not sure why you have all bolds on that site. Generally designers use bold to make something unique from the rest of the content on the page. Making everything bold will regularly confuse users. It also looks better not to have it in bold.
I would suggest you review the ideas that templateworld.com. I used to own my own design site for a while including holding a graphicz.com in our hands. I have had much experience. Please do not think I am being unfair or harsh, I'm just trying to give you some feedback.
thank you very much..constructive indeed
QUOTE(Nexus @ Apr 17 2008, 04:34 AM)
I have to agree with IamShipon on this one. The layout is plain. But my main problem with is...
THERE'S NO SUCH FUCKING THING AS WEB 2.0. God dammit, Web 2.0 DOES NOT exist. It's just a fancy catch phrase for "newer" and templates that are more fancy that people like. So what? People could've made "Web 2.0" templates before "Web 2.0" even existed. It's a catch phrase that means nothing. Never has, never will.
I'm sick and tired of people trying to convey their websites as 2 point friggin 0 when it's NOT.
THERE'S NO SUCH FUCKING THING AS WEB 2.0. God dammit, Web 2.0 DOES NOT exist. It's just a fancy catch phrase for "newer" and templates that are more fancy that people like. So what? People could've made "Web 2.0" templates before "Web 2.0" even existed. It's a catch phrase that means nothing. Never has, never will.
I'm sick and tired of people trying to convey their websites as 2 point friggin 0 when it's NOT.
Web 2.0 does not exist...do you come from underground? or from outer space? go to the doctor if you're sick idiot...and next time review the site.
My statement is true regardless if you like or not. Gonna get offended by a bad review or something? Gonna make you CRY?! As for the template, I don't mind it but it just is a bit too plain. Too much white...
OK lets clarify this before it gets a bit too harsh and causes issues. Technically "web 2.0" does not exist. It is just a name given by users to replace the current long name of the NEW GENERATION OF WEB-DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT. The world is split into groups of those who call it Web2.0 and those who don't. So it really doesn't matter what you call it. It will eventually mean the same.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.