Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Virgin Media Ceo Says Net Neutrality Is “a Load Of Bollocks”
Zymic Webmaster Forums > General Discussion > Serious Business
Alex
From: http://torrentfreak.com/virgin-media-ceo-s...ollocks-080413/

QUOTE
The new CEO of Virgin Media is putting his cards on the table early, branding net neutrality “a load of bollocks” and claiming he’s already doing deals to deliver some people’s content faster than others. If you aren’t prepared to cough up the extra cash, he says he’ll put you in the Internet “bus lane”.

Net neutrality really is the hot topic at the moment. Ignited by the Comcast fiasco, the concept of net neutrality has certainly been brought into the mainstream. Most ISPs are never quite forthcoming about their throttling, capping and otherwise interfering behavior, but that crowd certainly doesn’t include the CEO of Virgin Media, the UK’s second largest ISP.

In an interview with the Royal Television Society’s Television magazine, far from covering up their intentions, Virgin Media’s new incoming CEO Neil Berkett - who joined the Virgin Media Board just a few days ago - has launched an attack on the ideas and principles behind net neutrality.

“This net neutrality thing is a load of bollocks,” he said, adding that Virgin is already in the process of doing deals to speed up the traffic of certain media providers.

With around 3.5 million customers in the UK, and already traffic shaping due to lack of capacity, it’s a sobering thought that at the behest of “content providers” with deep pockets, Virgin is prepared to speed up their traffic, which would presumably have a negative impact on those at the bottom of the ISP’s priority list, namely bandwidth hungry file-sharers.

Berkett then turned on the BBC and their iPlayer service, telling them - and other public broadcasters like them - that if they don’t pay a premium to gain faster access to Virgin Media’s customers, their service would be put into “bus lanes”.

It just shows that some ISPs are happy to throttle just about anyone in the name of profit, it’s just that most aren’t as open about it as Mr Berkett.


Oh dear... really not happy about this. Unfortunately, since they are pretty much the only cable ISP out there, and are rolling out "50mb/s" broadband soon, I don't expect any boycott to stick.

It's extortion really, except now the ISPs seem to have grown bored of sucking us dry, and are now looking to take the content providers' money. Times like this, I really do start planning a move someplace else.
Valency
I agree, Extortioinate!
Bash+
QUOTE(Valency @ Apr 14 2008, 12:03 AM) *
I agree, Extortioinate!


It's pretty infuriating isn't it.
There a couple of points here:

1. I don't mind someone with more money than me getting 8 MB/s and me only getting 2 MB/s but I do object to them shaping my traffic so that the other traffic is prioritised above mine.
That said, there is 'the backhaul problem' isn't there. The bottom line is that for 12.99 a month I guess they can't afford to carry all of the traffic - BT's wholesale prices are too high.

The stories about the BBC are probably only the start -

There's a ton of stories in this thread
BBC tells ISPs to get stuffed

The mobile operators have the same problem. They struggle to shift data to and from the cells - they use a mix of T1, DSL and microwave to do that, but the next generation of networks will put massive strain on their backhaul.

2. 50 MB/s is just the start - I heard one of their guys saying the other day that is just the start and that they'll have the capacity for 100 and even more by the end of the year.

Bash
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2013 Invision Power Services, Inc.