I've recently copied my own article, written by my self, originally titled "Submitting to web directories is useless job?!" from my own website, and I've published it on GoArticles.com as my own article, because it really is my... The article was about web directories, and how really is helpful submitting to them, titled as "Web Directories - helpful or useless?!". Couple of days later I've posted on some other blog, something related with previous article, and have linked to it too... Eventually, I've got a few replays with advices in form like: it is NOT recommended to duplicate (copy and past) any content, no matter if I am author or not, because it might be taken for a copyright violation... They have also quoted a few examples for instance how Google was referred to the similar cases they have...
At first I was surprised, and wondered how is that possible... I mean, if I wrote something, and I am author of the particular article, then I have right to duplicate it as much as I like too?! But, in the other hand, I don't have reason question these theories. They have tried to support it by some evidence?!
However, I know, for example, Googlebot has very powerful history storage, so they can easily trace who is writing what, and which article appears first, which later?!
But, what if... what if search engine wasn't cache my article first... what if search engine cache copy of the article fist then original... who knows??? Everything is possible!!!
So, I ask you people, what do you think about this dilemma? If I duplicate my own content... am I still an author, or just another "replicator"
Snooper